大学职业搜题刷题APP
下载APP
首页
课程
题库模板
Word题库模板
Excel题库模板
PDF题库模板
医考护考模板
答案在末尾模板
答案分章节末尾模板
题库创建教程
创建题库
登录
logo - 刷刷题
创建自己的小题库
搜索
【单选题】

Questions are based on the following passage. Over a decade ago, psychologist Barry Schwartz published what might be the ultimate psychological book, The Paradox (悖论) of Choice: Why More Is Less.In it, Schwartz argues that the modern world's smorgasbord (大杂烩) of options——Coke Zero or Diet? Major in sociology or psychology? makes us less happy, not more.'Choice overload', as he calls it, makes us question our decisions, set our expectations too high, and blame ourselves for our mistakes. One of my favorite Schwartzisms is this: If you ever aren't sure if you attended the very best party or bought the very best computer, just settle for 'good enough'.People who do this are called'satisficers', and they're consistently happier, he's found, than are 'maximizers' (完美主义者), people who feel that they must choose the very best possible option.Maximizers earn more, Schwartz has found, but they're also less satisfied with their jobs.In fact, they're more likely to be clinically depressed in general. The reason this happens, as Schwartz explained in a paper with his Swarthmore colleague Andrew Ward, is that as life circumstances improve, expectations rise. People begin comparing their experiences to peers who are doing better, or to past experiences they've personally had that were better. As people have contact with items of high quality, they begin to suffer from 'the curse of insight'.The lower quality items that used to be perfectly acceptable are no longer good enough.The cheerful zero point keeps rising, and expectations and aspirations rise with it.As a result, the rising quality of experience is met with rising expectations, and people are just running in place.As long as expectations keep pace with realizations, people may live better, but they won't feel better about how they live. Schwartz' solution, as he recently explained to the psychology blogger Eric Barker, is just to settle for something that's acceptable——even if you know there's likely something better out there.Whenever you need a new laptop, buy the laptop identical with your maximizer friends'.It is probably not the perfect laptop for you, but good enough for you.It takes you five minutes to make a decision instead of five weeks and it's a 'good enough' decision. It can be hard, in our culture, to force yourself to settle for 'good enough'.But when it comes to happiness and satisfaction, 'good enough' isn't just good——it's perfect. What can be inferred from Schwartz‘s book? 查看材料

A.
Striving for perfection is always a bad idea.
B.
It is important not to have any expectation.
C.
Too many options actually cause more mental distress.
D.
Choice is one not merely of quantity, but of quality.
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
收藏 - 刷刷题收藏
举报
参考答案:
举一反三

【单选题】出现投票悖论的原因是()。

A.
投票人的偏好都是单峰偏好
B.
投票规则错误
C.
不民主
D.
有投票人的偏好是多峰偏好

【多选题】C值悖论内容包括

A.
物种DNA中的G+C的比例过高,导致PCR解旋温度高
B.
有时进化程度低的反而更高
C.
亲缘关系近的物种可能差异大
D.
一些物种的C值远远超过了遗传信息的需要

【多选题】辛普森悖论产生的原因是( )

A.
分组比较中都占优势的一方,在总评中有时反而是失势的一方
B.
同一个数据集却有两个完全相反的观点,整体的趋势和分组后的趋势完全不同
C.
控制对撞因子后造成了相反的相关性
D.
数据中隐藏着一个潜在变量
相关题目:
【单选题】出现投票悖论的原因是()。
A.
投票人的偏好都是单峰偏好
B.
投票规则错误
C.
不民主
D.
有投票人的偏好是多峰偏好
【多选题】C值悖论内容包括
A.
物种DNA中的G+C的比例过高,导致PCR解旋温度高
B.
有时进化程度低的反而更高
C.
亲缘关系近的物种可能差异大
D.
一些物种的C值远远超过了遗传信息的需要
【多选题】辛普森悖论产生的原因是( )
A.
分组比较中都占优势的一方,在总评中有时反而是失势的一方
B.
同一个数据集却有两个完全相反的观点,整体的趋势和分组后的趋势完全不同
C.
控制对撞因子后造成了相反的相关性
D.
数据中隐藏着一个潜在变量
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
参考解析:
AI解析
重新生成
题目纠错 0
发布
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
刷刷题-单词鸭