大学职业搜题刷题APP
下载APP
首页
课程
题库模板
Word题库模板
Excel题库模板
PDF题库模板
医考护考模板
答案在末尾模板
答案分章节末尾模板
题库创建教程
创建题库
登录
logo - 刷刷题
创建自己的小题库
搜索
【简答题】

Gregory Currie, a professor of philosophy at the University of Nottingham, recently argued in The New York Times that we ought not to claim that literature improves us as people, because there is no “compelling evidence that suggests that people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy” or other great books. Actually, there is such evidence. Raymond Mar, a psychologist at York University in Canada, and Keith Oatley, a professor of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto, reported in studies published in 2006 and 2009 that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize (起共鸣) with them and view the world from their perspective. This link persisted even after the researchers factored in the possibility that more empathetic individuals might choose to read more novels. Recent research in cognitive science, psychology and neuroscience has demonstrated that deep reading of books is a distinctive experience, very different from the information-driven reading we do on the Web. Although deep reading does not, strictly speaking, require a conventional book, the built-in limits of the printed page are uniquely conducive to the deep reading experience. A book’s lack of hyperlinks allowing the reader to remain fully immersed in the narrative, without having to make such decisions as whether to click on a link or not. That immersion is supported by the way the brain handles language rich in sensory detail and emotional and moral complexity, by creating a mental representation that draws on the same brain regions that would be active if the scene were unfolding in real life. The emotional situations and moral dilemmas that are the stuff of literature are also vigorous exercise for the brain, propelling us inside the heads of fictional characters and even increasing our real-life capacity for empathy. This is not reading as many young people are coming to know it. Their reading, mostly done onscreen, is pragmatic (实际的) and instrumental. If we allow our children to believe reading onscreen is all there is, we will have deprived them of an enjoyable and enlightening experience that will enlarge them as people. Instead molding our education around young people’s attachment to digital devices and onscreen habits, we need to show them some place they’ve never been, a place only deep reading can take them. Asian stereotypes are everywhere. More often than not, if you see an Asian American depicted on the screen, you’ll also see an Asian stereotype. These stereotypes are unrealistic and offensive, but unfortunately they often fall under the popular radar and go unnoticed and unquestioned. One of the most pervasive Asian stereotypes is that Asian Americans are foreigners who cannot be assimilated. Because Asian Americans are racially and culturally distinctive from the American mainstream, so / and they have been widely seen as unable to be absorbed into American society. According to this view, anything Asians do is thus inherently “alien” to America. For instance, mainstream TV and movie often portray Asian Americans as being “unassimilated”, or having “exotic” qualities like martial arts ability, accented English, and a propensity (嗜好) for eating strange things. The problem in my experience is that these few portrayals end up being what people expect of me, and other Asian Americans, too. When people look at me, they expect something that I am not – they expect an exotic “other” that doesn’t belong “here”, that is, in the United States. I often encounter people who assume that I’m either an immigrant restaurant worker or an international student at the local university – two things that place an immigrant or foreign identity on me, even though I’m an American citizen and have been living in the US my entire life. The stereotype of Asian Americans as foreign or “other” is embedded in American culture and passes by unnoticed. My identity as an Asian American becomes invisible. It creates a divide between who I am and how I am perceived – it’s like my US citizenship status is dictated by my appearance and my ethnic background. How do we fix these things? We should become more aware. We think about them and talk about them. We maybe even yell about them. We acknowledge how these representations make us feel uncomfortable about ourselves, or, in the best cases, proud to be who we are. As people of color, we should fight for the right to our own identities and who we are. It’s an ongoing process: think, talk, yell, and fight.

手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
收藏 - 刷刷题收藏
举报
参考答案:
举一反三

【单选题】编制公关预算,实际过程是()

A.
将公关计划具体化
B.
制定公关行动方案
C.
检验公关工作进程
D.
将公关计划优化

【多选题】胸腔共鸣的作用在于( )。

A.
形成“金属声”
B.
增加音量
C.
使声音听起来洪亮、浑厚、有力
D.
使字音圆润清晰

【单选题】根据叶先生一家的实际收支状况,叶先生手中持有的8万元股票应该( )

A.
继续持有
B.
将股票变现,转换为银行存款
C.
将股票变现,重新构建长期低风险的基金投资组合
D.
将股票变现,加上银行存款10万元,提前偿还房贷
相关题目:
【单选题】编制公关预算,实际过程是()
A.
将公关计划具体化
B.
制定公关行动方案
C.
检验公关工作进程
D.
将公关计划优化
【多选题】胸腔共鸣的作用在于( )。
A.
形成“金属声”
B.
增加音量
C.
使声音听起来洪亮、浑厚、有力
D.
使字音圆润清晰
【单选题】根据叶先生一家的实际收支状况,叶先生手中持有的8万元股票应该( )
A.
继续持有
B.
将股票变现,转换为银行存款
C.
将股票变现,重新构建长期低风险的基金投资组合
D.
将股票变现,加上银行存款10万元,提前偿还房贷
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
参考解析:
AI解析
重新生成
题目纠错 0
发布
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
刷刷题-刷题-导入试题 - 刷刷题
刷刷题-单词鸭