创建自己的小题库
搜索
【单选题】
Tom was so obviously sorry for his mistake that we __________ him.
A.
forgave
B.
pardoned
C.
excused
D.
punished
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
反馈
收藏
举报参考答案：
举一反三
【单选题】Which of the following best describes the relation-ship between the McLaurin decision and the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision（） During the 1930s National Association for the Advancement of C...
A.
During the 1930s National Association for the
B.
Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) attor-
C.
neys Charles H. Houston, William Hastie, James
D.
Line M. Nabrit, Leon Ransom, and Thurgood Marshall
E.
(5) charted a legal strategy designed to end segrega-
F.
tion in education. They developed a series of
G.
legal cases challenging segregation in graduate
H.
and professional schools. Houston believed that
I.
the battle against segregation had to begin at the
J.
(10) highest academic level in order to mitigate fear of
.
race mixing that could create even greater hostili-
K.
ty and reluctance on the part of white judges.
L.
After establishing a series of favorable legal
M.
precedents in higher education, NAACP attorneys
N.
(15) planned to launch an all-out attack on the sepa-
.
rate-but-equal doctrine in primary and secondary
.
schools. The strategy proved successful. In four
.
major United States Supreme Court decisions
.
precedents were established that would enable the
.
(20) NAACP to construct a solid legal foundation
.
upon which the Brown case could rest: Missouri
.
ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, Registrar of the
.
University of Missouri (1938); Sipuel v. Board of
.
Regents of the University of Oklahoma (1948);
.
(25) McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher
.
Education (1950); and Sweatt v. Painter (1950).
.
In the Oklahoma case, the Supreme Court held
.
that the plaintiff was entitled to enroll in the
.
University. The Oklahoma Regents responded by
.
(30) separating black and white students in cafeterias
.
and classrooms. The 1950 McLaurin decision
.
ruled that such internal separation was unconstitu-
.
tional. In the Sweatt ruling, delivered on the same
.
day, the Supreme Court held that the maintenance
.
(35) of separate law schools for whites and blacks was
.
unconstitutional. A year after Herman Sweatt
.
entered the University of Texas law school,
.
desegregation cases were filed in the states of
.
Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware,
.
(40) and in the District of Columbia asking the courts
.
to apply the qualitative test of the Sweatt case to
.
the elementary and secondary schools and to
.
declare the separate-but-equal doctrine invalid in
.
the area of public education.
.
(45) The 1954 Brown v. Board of Education deci-
.
sion declared that a classification based solely on
.
race violated the 14th Amendment to the United
.
States Constitution. The decision reversed the
.
1896 Plessy v. Ferguson ruling which had estab-
.
(50) lished the separate-but-equal doctrine. The Brown
.
decision more than any other case launched the
.
"equalitarian revolution" in American jurispru-
.
dence and signalled the emerging primacy of
.
equality as a guide to constitutional decisions;
.
(55) nevertheless, the decision did not end state-
.
sanctioned segregation. Indeed, the second Brown
.
decision, known as Brown H and delivered a year
.
later, played a decisive role in limiting the effec-
.
tiveness and impact of the 1954 case by providing
.
(60) southern states with the opportunity to delay the
.
implementation of desegregation.
（）
相关题目：
【单选题】Which of the following best describes the relation-ship between the McLaurin decision and the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision（） During the 1930s National Association for the Advancement of C...
A.
During the 1930s National Association for the
B.
Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) attor-
C.
neys Charles H. Houston, William Hastie, James
D.
Line M. Nabrit, Leon Ransom, and Thurgood Marshall
E.
(5) charted a legal strategy designed to end segrega-
F.
tion in education. They developed a series of
G.
legal cases challenging segregation in graduate
H.
and professional schools. Houston believed that
I.
the battle against segregation had to begin at the
J.
(10) highest academic level in order to mitigate fear of
.
race mixing that could create even greater hostili-
K.
ty and reluctance on the part of white judges.
L.
After establishing a series of favorable legal
M.
precedents in higher education, NAACP attorneys
N.
(15) planned to launch an all-out attack on the sepa-
.
rate-but-equal doctrine in primary and secondary
.
schools. The strategy proved successful. In four
.
major United States Supreme Court decisions
.
precedents were established that would enable the
.
(20) NAACP to construct a solid legal foundation
.
upon which the Brown case could rest: Missouri
.
ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, Registrar of the
.
University of Missouri (1938); Sipuel v. Board of
.
Regents of the University of Oklahoma (1948);
.
(25) McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher
.
Education (1950); and Sweatt v. Painter (1950).
.
In the Oklahoma case, the Supreme Court held
.
that the plaintiff was entitled to enroll in the
.
University. The Oklahoma Regents responded by
.
(30) separating black and white students in cafeterias
.
and classrooms. The 1950 McLaurin decision
.
ruled that such internal separation was unconstitu-
.
tional. In the Sweatt ruling, delivered on the same
.
day, the Supreme Court held that the maintenance
.
(35) of separate law schools for whites and blacks was
.
unconstitutional. A year after Herman Sweatt
.
entered the University of Texas law school,
.
desegregation cases were filed in the states of
.
Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware,
.
(40) and in the District of Columbia asking the courts
.
to apply the qualitative test of the Sweatt case to
.
the elementary and secondary schools and to
.
declare the separate-but-equal doctrine invalid in
.
the area of public education.
.
(45) The 1954 Brown v. Board of Education deci-
.
sion declared that a classification based solely on
.
race violated the 14th Amendment to the United
.
States Constitution. The decision reversed the
.
1896 Plessy v. Ferguson ruling which had estab-
.
(50) lished the separate-but-equal doctrine. The Brown
.
decision more than any other case launched the
.
"equalitarian revolution" in American jurispru-
.
dence and signalled the emerging primacy of
.
equality as a guide to constitutional decisions;
.
(55) nevertheless, the decision did not end state-
.
sanctioned segregation. Indeed, the second Brown
.
decision, known as Brown H and delivered a year
.
later, played a decisive role in limiting the effec-
.
tiveness and impact of the 1954 case by providing
.
(60) southern states with the opportunity to delay the
.
implementation of desegregation.
参考解析：
AI解析
重新生成
题目纠错 0
发布
