Euthanasia can be either active or passive: (46) Active euthanasia means that a physician or other medical personnel take a deliberate action that will induce death, such as administering an overdose of , insulin , or barbiturates, followed by an injection of curare. Passive euthanasia means letting a patient die for lack of treatment, or suspending treatment that has begun. Examples of passive euthanasia include taking patient off a respirator (a breathing apparatus) or removing other life -support systems. Stopping the food supply--usually intravenous feeding to comatose patients--has also been used.
A good deal of the controversy about mercy killing stems from the decision - process. Who decides if a patient is to die This issue has not been established legally. (47) In the United States the matter is left to state law, which usually allows the physician in charge to suggest the option of death to a patient’ s relatives, especially if the patient is brain - dead. In an attempt to make decisions about when their own lives should end, several terminally iii patients in the early 1990s used a controversial suicide device , developed by Dr. Jack Kevorkian, to end their lives.
In parts of Europe, the decision - process has become very flexible. (48) Even in cases that are not terminal, patients have been put to death without their consent at the request of relatives or at the insistence of physicians. Many capes of involuntary euthanasia in valve older people. Newborn infants suffering from incurable conditions are also routinely allowed to die. The principle underlying this practice is that such individuals have a concept that "life not worthy of life". This concept was devised in Germany during the Nazi regime (1933 -45) , when numerous killings of the aged, mentally iii, handicapped, and others were authorized by the state.
In countries where involuntary euthanasia is not .legal , the court systems have proved very lenient in dealing with medical personnel who practice it. (49) Courts have also been somewhat lenient with friends or relatives who have assisted terminally iii patients to die or who have, in some cases ,killed them directly.
Medical advances in recent decades have made it possible to keep terminally ill people alive far beyond any hope of recovery or improvement. For this reason the "living will" has come into common use in the United States as part of the right - to - die principle. (50) Most states now legally allow the of such wills that instruct hospitals and physicians to suspend treatment in hopeless cases or to re fuse futile life - support measures when chances of recovery are nonexistent.
The 20th - century euthanasia movement began in England in 1935, with the founding of the Voluntary Euthanasia Legislation Society. In the United States the Society for the Right to Die was founded in 1938.

(50) Most states now legally allow the of such wills that instruct hospitals and physicians to suspend treatment in hopeless cases or to re fuse futile life - support measures when chances of recovery are nonexistent.

Euthanasia can be either active or passive: (46) Active euthanasia means that a physician or other medical personnel take a deliberate action that will induce death, such as administering an overdose of , insulin , or barbiturates, followed by an injection of curare. Passive euthanasia means letting a patient die for lack of treatment, or suspending treatment that has begun. Examples of passive euthanasia include taking patient off a respirator (a breathing apparatus) or removing other life -support systems. Stopping the food supply--usually intravenous feeding to comatose patients--has also been used.
A good deal of the controversy about mercy killing stems from the decision - process. Who decides if a patient is to die This issue has not been established legally. (47) In the United States the matter is left to state law, which usually allows the physician in charge to suggest the option of death to a patient’ s relatives, especially if the patient is brain - dead. In an attempt to make decisions about when their own lives should end, several terminally iii patients in the early 1990s used a controversial suicide device , developed by Dr. Jack Kevorkian, to end their lives.
In parts of Europe, the decision - process has become very flexible. (48) Even in cases that are not terminal, patients have been put to death without their consent at the request of relatives or at the insistence of physicians. Many capes of involuntary euthanasia in valve older people. Newborn infants suffering from incurable conditions are also routinely allowed to die. The principle underlying this practice is that such individuals have a concept that "life not worthy of life". This concept was devised in Germany during the Nazi regime (1933 -45) , when numerous killings of the aged, mentally iii, handicapped, and others were authorized by the state.
In countries where involuntary euthanasia is not .legal , the court systems have proved very lenient in dealing with medical personnel who practice it. (49) Courts have also been somewhat lenient with friends or relatives who have assisted terminally iii patients to die or who have, in some cases ,killed them directly.
Medical advances in recent decades have made it possible to keep terminally ill people alive far beyond any hope of recovery or improvement. For this reason the "living will" has come into common use in the United States as part of the right - to - die principle. (50) Most states now legally allow the of such wills that instruct hospitals and physicians to suspend treatment in hopeless cases or to re fuse futile life - support measures when chances of recovery are nonexistent.
The 20th - century euthanasia movement began in England in 1935, with the founding of the Voluntary Euthanasia Legislation Society. In the United States the Society for the Right to Die was founded in 1938.